<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gay All The Time &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/tag/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gay-247.com/comments</link>
	<description>About being Gay and being Proud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>In Denial</title>
		<link>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/06/27/in-denial/</link>
		<comments>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/06/27/in-denial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cranky one</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate of infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexuallly transmitted diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STDs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gay-247.com/comments/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frankly Americans amaze me. And not really in a good way, but then too, I think people in general are falling into that category. What with all this bullshit about Abstinence, and how they (parents) can&#8217;t let their innocent little Johnny or Suzie find out about sex, because well, GOD won&#8217;t like it. Abstinence as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly Americans amaze me. And not really in a good way, but then too, I think <strong>people in general</strong> are falling into that category. What with all this bullshit about <strong>Abstinence</strong>, and how they <span style="color: #0000ff;">(parents)</span> can&#8217;t let their innocent little Johnny or Suzie find out about sex, because well, <strong>GOD</strong> won&#8217;t like it. Abstinence as defined by the <strong>Bush Administration</strong> is a joke really, one that has some serious repercussions for children.</p>
<p><strong>STDs</strong> <span style="color: #0000ff;">(Sexually Transmitted Diseases)</span> can be killers. They can blind you, make you impotent, or cause serious harm internally, and of course, <strong>THEY CAN KILL</strong>.</p>
<p>Lack of concise information, <strong>OF EDUCATION</strong>, is needed and it has to begin at an early enough age to have an impact. This dribble of teaching about <strong>Abstinence</strong>, of saving one&#8217;s self is nice, in theory, but in Practice it really had <strong>no visible impact</strong> on teenage sex. <strong>It doesn&#8217;t curtail it,</strong> and it certainly doesn&#8217;t lessen it, but what it does do is give a false sense of security, of invincibility that leads to serious health risks.</p>
<p>In <strong>Pennsylvania,</strong> one district, there is an unbelievable rate of infections, but what is scary about the story, is that on a national basis, the rates aren&#8217;t declining. That after <strong>EIGHT YEARS OF BUSHISM</strong>, the health of the young has gotten worse. This is from a lack of <strong>EDUCATION</strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong><span id="intelliTXT">It’s estimated that 10 percent of the 3,000 middle and high school students in the Delaware Valley School District in Milford, P.A., are infected with an STD — including one confirmed case of HIV, Times Herald Record reported Friday. (source &#8211; <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,372728,00.html" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Fox News</span></span></a>)</span></strong></p></blockquote>
<p>It really is confusing. I mean there is outrage over the <a title="Gay Talk on Supreme Court and rapists" href="http://www.gaystoryman.com/talk/index.php/2008/06/26/deserving-the-death-penalty/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Supreme Court Ruling</strong></span></span></a> that <strong>Child Reapists</strong> can&#8217;t be <strong>Executed</strong>, and yet these same people are allowing their children to become infected with life threatening illness, <span style="color: #0000ff;">because somehow sex is dirty,</span> and not to be discussed.</p>
<p><strong>It really makes no sense.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/06/27/in-denial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marriage Wins over Civil Partnership</title>
		<link>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/05/15/civil-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/05/15/civil-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 19:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cranky one</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In Your Face]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights of all]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/05/15/civil-rights/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a 4 to 3 decision, the California Supreme Court ruled that it just isn&#8217;t good enough to have a Civil Partnership or Union in place of calling it Marriage, even if the couple is homosexual. That it has to be Marriage is a victory, one that affirms that there is One Law for Everyone. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a 4 to 3 decision, the <strong>California Supreme Court</strong> ruled that it just isn&#8217;t good enough to have a Civil Partnership or Union in place of calling it Marriage, even if the couple is homosexual. That it has to be Marriage is a victory, one that affirms that there is <strong>One Law for Everyone</strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p>California already offers same-sex couples who register as domestic partners the same legal rights and responsibilities as married spouses, including the right to divorce and sue for child support.</p>
<p>But in the justices&#8217; recent 4-3 decision, they stated that domestic partnerships are not a good enough substitute for marriage. (<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2008/05/15/california-court.html?ref=rss" title="from CBC News" target="_blank"><font color="#ff0000"><u><strong>source &#8211; CBC News</strong></u></font></a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>While some in the GLBT community thought it better to seek something called Civil Union, Domestic Partnership or some other catch phrase, I have maintained that anything less puts whatever rights given to those &#8216;new agreements&#8217; at risk. At any time, a legislature could alter or remove those rights, without flinching, because after all, it would only apply to the Queers. So why would mainstream America give a damn?</p>
<p><strong>The California Supreme Court seems to agree</strong>.</p>
<p>It was the same argument the racists used against granting equality to people of color back in the Sixties, which is why it is important to fight segregation at all times. <a href="http://www.gaystoryman.com/talk/index.php/2007/02/20/separate-not-equal/" title="Gay Talk on separate but not equal" target="_blank"><font color="#ff0000"><u><strong>Separate but Equal does not exist</strong></u></font></a>.</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/05/15/civil-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

