<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gay All The Time &#187; DADT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/tag/dadt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gay-247.com/comments</link>
	<description>About being Gay and being Proud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:00:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Better to Lie than tell the truth</title>
		<link>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/07/27/better-to-lie-than-tell-the-truth/</link>
		<comments>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/07/27/better-to-lie-than-tell-the-truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cranky one</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HIV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military bigotry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pundits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax dollars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit cohesiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gay-247.com/comments/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They actually get paid, by tax payer dollars, to advise the Military, to tell them that letting Gays serve openly will cause a rise in HIV infection, among US service people. Like are they trying to say that there are a lot more homo's in the US Military or that many more will be willing to take it up the ass, simply because a gay guy is in their unit? What absolute twaddle, and the tax payer pays for it. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is what <strong>DADT</strong>[1. <strong><span style="color: #800080;">US military policy acronym for Don't Ask, Don't Tell, regarding gays serving in the armed forces</span></strong>] is really about. While <a title="discussing retirement of General Pace" href="http://www.gaystoryman.com/talk/2007/06/17/general-pace-hypocrisy/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>General Peter Pace</strong></span></span></a> claims the US Military upholds a higher standard of ethics, he supports the <span style="color: #0000ff;">Clinton Compromise</span> of making people <strong>LIE.</strong> Now some will argue that <strong>DADT</strong> isn&#8217;t about lying, just not volunteering information, but isn&#8217;t there something in the Bible about <span style="color: #0000ff;">Sins of Omission</span>? Yet here is the <span style="color: #0000ff;">Religious Right</span> insisting that Homosexuals abandon their truth, that they <strong>OMIT</strong> telling anyone they are, <strong>WHO GOD CREATED</strong>.</p>
<p>The <strong>US Congress</strong> is once again debating this fifteen year old bill, and again the <span style="color: #0000ff;">religious nut jobs</span> are in full throttle. Again they claim that having openly serving gays will <strong>disrupt unit cohesiveness</strong>, will create untold problems, but what they don&#8217;t get, that shit didn&#8217;t work in the late 1940&#8217;s and 1950&#8217;s either when they tried to <span style="color: #0000ff;">deny blacks</span> from serving in mixed units.  <strong>Racism Never Works</strong>.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Among the most arresting debates Wednesday came when Rep. Patrick Murphy, D-Pa., a first-term congressman and the only Iraq war veteran in Congress, accused a witness of implying that U.S. service members weren&#8217;t professional enough to handle serving with homosexuals. (source &#8211; <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/23/national/main4288834.shtml" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">CBS News</span></span></a>)</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>In some ways, I would agree. Americans really don&#8217;t seem willing to accept change, or people who are different very easily. <strong>I would call that racism</strong>, but then I am not <span style="color: #0000ff;">politically correct.</span> Course all those who oppose homosexuals, do so out of a deep moral conviction, a deep religious belief. They seem to forget, that as all man is created by <strong>HIM</strong>, that even us <span style="color: #0000ff;">nasty queers</span> are <strong>HIS CHILDREN</strong>.</p>
<p>So now, they have come up with a new one. They claim that allowing us <strong>Queers</strong> to openly serve, and because we are such horny persuasive people, the incidents of <strong>HIV INFECTION</strong> will rise Dramatically among the <span style="color: #0000ff;">US Military Personnel</span>.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Donnelly contended that if the law were repealed the number of HIV-positive service members would probably increase.</p>
<p>Rep. Vic Snyder, D-Ark., a Vietnam veteran and medical doctor, called that comment &#8220;so inappropriate&#8221; and suggested that Donnelly advocate for the military to recruit only lesbians, who he said have a low incidence of HIV. (source &#8211; <a title="more here" href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/23/national/main4288834.shtml" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">CBS News</span></span></a>)</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>You gotta love these hypocrites. To begin with, HIV is not restricted to just <strong>Gay Men</strong>, just as <a title="information on gonorrhea at gay fiction" href="http://gay-fiction.com/reading/sexual-terms/gonorrhea/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Gonorrhea</span></span></a> or Syphilis aren&#8217;t restricted to <strong>single straight heterosexuals</strong>. Then again, I suppose this is all part of the secret <strong>Gay Agenda</strong>, to infect straight soldiers with <span style="color: #0000ff;">HIV</span>, so we can make them all Gay too. What galls me is that these people are being paid by <strong>Tax Dollars</strong> for their warped opinions. <strong>No wonder the Military is so screwed up.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/07/27/better-to-lie-than-tell-the-truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Married Gays Don&#8217;t Count</title>
		<link>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/07/19/married-gays-dont-count/</link>
		<comments>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/07/19/married-gays-dont-count/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cranky one</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense of marraige act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate crimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mathew Shepard Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual orientation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gay-247.com/comments/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can't formulate policy without knowing the figures. How can you determine what to spend, if you don't know how many need a program? Yet the US Census will not count Gays, or Gay Couples thanks to the Defense of Marriage Act. They will have no real way of knowing how many gay kids there are, because they don't ask if you are or not. No wonder passage of the Mathew Shepard Act is in limbo or why the military refuses to repeal DADT. No One knows how many Gays there are, or aren't.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems that in the <strong>2010 Census</strong>, Married Gay Couples in <span style="color: #0000ff;">CA &amp; MASS</span> won&#8217;t be counted in the US Census. It is being claimed that due to the &#8216;<span style="color: #0000ff;">Defense of Marriage Act</span>&#8216; that they passed, it doesn&#8217;t matter what individual States do or don&#8217;t do, least when it applies to Homosexuals.</p>
<blockquote><p>The Census Bureau says the federal Defense of Marriage Act bars the agency from recognizing gay marriages in the nation&#8217;s 10-year count, even though the marriages are legal in Massachusetts and California. (source &#8211; <a title="more from CBS " href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/07/18/national/main4271220.shtml?source=RSSattr=HOME_4271220" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">CBS News</span></span></a>)</p></blockquote>
<p>I suppose many are probably saying: <strong>SO What?</strong></p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-64" style="border: 0pt none; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="Benefits" src="http://gay-247.com/comments/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/slicing-pie.gif" alt="being kept in the closet" width="175" height="128" />Well at first so did I, until I read the story, and one small blurb is what got the mind clicking. If &#8216;<span style="color: #0000ff;">married</span>&#8216; gay couples aren&#8217;t listed, or shown, how can there be any effort to force a change in the <strong>Federal System</strong> of granting benefits to <span style="color: #0000ff;">Gay Couples</span>? Politicians <strong>RELY</strong> on the Census for demographics, to help formulate their policies, or at least that is the theory.</p>
<p>So if <strong>Gay Couples</strong> aren&#8217;t listed, aren&#8217;t counted, how can any <span style="color: #0000ff;">Government Agency</span> take note of it? Seems that by <strong>NOT COUNTING GAY COUPLES</strong> or even <strong>LISTING SEXUAL ORIENTATION</strong>, <span style="color: #0000ff;">we are being kept in the Closet.</span> It makes <strong>US INVISIBLE TO THE ELECTED OFFICIALS.</strong> And that is not a good thing.</p>
<p>If they know there are <span style="color: #0000ff;">X Number of Gay&#8217;s</span>, it might sway them to <strong>NOT IGNORE OUR NEEDS</strong>.</p>
<p>It might make the recall of <a title="discussing the hypocrisy of US Military" href="http://www.gaystoryman.com/talk/index.php/2006/11/15/gays-are-patriots-too/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>DADT</strong></span></span></a> come quicker, might make the <span style="color: #0000ff;">Mathew Shepard Act</span> get signed into law, if they knew <strong>HOW MANY OF US THERE ARE.</strong> This is what &#8216;<span style="color: #0000ff;">not being counted</span>&#8216; really means. All this talk about bringing Immigrants <strong>OUT OF THE SHADOWS</strong> is bullshit, because here they are insuring that those of us who are different, <strong>ARE KEPT IN THE SHADOWS</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/07/19/married-gays-dont-count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Want to Hear it From Him</title>
		<link>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/06/28/gay-rights-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/06/28/gay-rights-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 18:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cranky one</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eguality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gay-247.com/comments/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama&#8217;s wife spoke about what her husband, if elected, would do for Gay Rights, as he did for Black Rights, in that he would push for equality, for opposing a ban on same sex marriage on a federal level, leaving the matter for the States to decide.
Fact is, 44 States have some form of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama&#8217;s wife spoke about what her husband, <strong>if elected,</strong> would do for <span style="color: #0000ff;">Gay Rights</span>, as he did for Black Rights, in that he would push for equality, for opposing a <strong>ban on same sex marriage</strong> on a federal level, leaving the matter for the States to decide.</p>
<p>Fact is, <strong>44 States</strong> have some form of state constitution amendment banning same sex marriage. So what is he going to do about that little obstacle?</p>
<p>So does his support mean anything, and is this just another &#8216;<span style="color: #0000ff;">surrogate</span>&#8216; telling an audience what they want? I would like to hear <strong>Barack Obama</strong> take that stand, make that pledge himself.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>NEW YORK &#8211; Barack Obama will fight for equal rights for gays just as he fought to help working-class families overcome poverty, the Democratic presidential hopeful&#8217;s wife told a gay Democratic group. (source &#8211; <a title="more from MSNBC" href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25412133/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">MSNBC News</span></span></a>)</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe it is just that Gays have been led down the garden path before. Remember <strong>Bill Clinton</strong> who lovingly gave us &#8216;<span style="color: #0000ff;">Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell</span>&#8216; and let&#8217;s not forget the other candidate,<strong> John McCain</strong>. He opposed a federal constitution amendment, but worked hard to get one passed in his home state. So just how <span style="color: #0000ff;">Gay Friendly</span> are either of these candidates?</p>
<p>While Obama has said that <a title="Gay Talk on DADT and discrimination of gays" href="http://www.gaystoryman.com/talk/index.php/2007/05/18/carter-opposes-dadt/" target="_blank"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>DADT</strong></span></span></a> <span style="color: #0000ff;">(Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell)</span> is counterproductive, he <strong>HAS YET TO SAY HE&#8217;D REPEAL IT</strong>.  Even <span style="color: #0000ff;">Hilary Clinton</span> <strong>NEVER</strong> said she would either, and we know <span style="color: #0000ff;">John McCain</span> isn&#8217;t about to, given how he thinks it works just fine.</p>
<p>Makes you wonder, how can anyone run for President when they <strong>ARE NOT PREPARED TO STAND UP FOR EVERY CITIZEN</strong>. I mean are Gay&#8217;s simply not have the <strong>VOTING CLOUT</strong> of say the <strong>EVANGELICALS</strong> that both <span style="color: #0000ff;">Obama &amp; McCain</span> are cozying up to?  Heck, they must have the <strong>CLOUT</strong>, given how they seem to feel it is their <span style="color: #0000ff;">God Given Right</span> to choose the <strong>REPUBLICAN NOMINEE</strong>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gay-247.com/comments/index.php/2008/06/28/gay-rights-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
